A Pathfinder we did from Wadebridge onto Bodmin Moor was almost a 100 ft per mile but was seen as an easy ride. Conversely, Paul’s ride, that had only slightly more climb, about 110 ft per mile, but was seen by some as very difficult.

The gearing of the bike may be the important issue here. As the steepness increases you change gear and consequently slow down - but always for the same effort. Until you run out of gears. (How many gears you have is entirely up to you.) Eventually you may run out of gears and some may wish to walk.

The gradient of a hill achieving 100 ft for every mile is I think 1.9 % ( For comparison sake the climb past the recycling centre to Longdowns is 2.6% ). So a series of 3.8% climbs, throughout a 25 mile ride would give 100 ft for every mile over the day - but wouldn’t be a challenging ride.

Personally I don’t think it’s a great idea dwelling too much on the amount of climb in a ride as it further complicates the task of the organiser who already has sufficient work planning an interesting route - we don’t want to compromise these rides because of the terrain. Just use the right equipment - not a single speed but a bike with plenty of gears!! Many in the club already have electric bikes for this very reason but if you don’t have the assistance of an electric motor, or sufficient low gears, you can always get off and walk a bit - there’s no harm in that - we are happy to wait.

I consider myself a strong rider but will still use a 12/30 cassette, the largest 10 speed Campagnolo make. Most are more likely to use Shimano so could buy a 11/34 cassette!  With a compact chainset this will give you a gear ratio of one to one, good enough for most regular cyclists to climb the steepest hills, albeit very slowly if you’re not such a strong rider.

Alas, we live in Cornwall. If you stubbornly refuse to change your gearing you may find you need counselling 🤭. Or move to Lincolnshire 😂😂😂

Personally I’ve been unhappy for a while about the way “we” conduct ourselves on public roads when out on group rides and all my comments so far have fallen on deaf ears. To the extent that I tend to ride only in small groups these days or, more recently, on my own.

During the last few weekends I’ve covered ground not usually ridden by any of us, to the extreme north, east and south eastern parts of Cornwall. I started to get a real feel about how cyclists are now seen by the motor driving public following the recent changes in the Highway Code. On the whole the change has been for the better with most drivers being more patient and giving more space when overtaking. However, some less confident and timid drivers, often uncertain of the new guidance, are reluctant to pass at all on a small country lane, even when the road ahead looks clear. They figure that the road is insufficiently wide to pass safely - and given the new guidance they are right, as a cyclist needs 2 meters + space. ( 500mm from edge of road, width of bike and the safe passing distance of 1500mm). To this extent the guidance just doesn’t work. We have to recognise this and find a suitable stopping place to allow the car or cars to pass. A main road with solid white lines in the centre often presents the same problem. More cyclists are using cameras and cars that are reluctant to overtake are not necessarily driven by timid drivers but possibly drivers who have already been convicted or cautioned for a close pass - not forgetting that some of the convicted drivers would also be cyclists! ( Though I think that vehicles are allowed over a solid white line when overtaking slow moving traffic?? )

The new guidance is there to help us as cyclists and we have to be (more) respectful to car drivers for making our experience on the roads safer. We need to be aware of all that is happening around us - which is sadly something cyclists are very poor at, particularly new cyclists. You should be able to turn your head, maybe along with part of your upper body, sufficient to get a snap shot of what is behind. This can be followed by standing and taking a longer look. Mirrors are really useful too for someone with restricted neck movement, but as in cars, unless you are monitoring continuously what is happening behind it is always advised to glance behind as well.

Regarding Pathfinders. Credit should be given to anyone willing to organise a day out for the club, and as a ride leader, there is little they can do to organise the “troops” behind and they need to have help - two or three stronger riders to pass information down the line - and a sweeper or two.

Finding somewhere out of the way to stop whilst the ride comes together might present one of the biggest challenges - this could be considered beforehand- or someone sent ahead to find a suitable spot. “Helpers” could wear fluorescent arm bands.

Though it takes something away from the “mystery” of the ride it would be helpful if the route was put on the website for people to view ( in addition to any gpx/tcx files ) so that anyone with one of the Croyde cycling maps of Cornwall ( I think the club has copies for sale ) can mark the route with a highlighter pen. This is then useful for any future rides with friends and family.

As I’ve already mentioned, it is essential that we maintain good relations with motorists. It is my opinion ( and this is not shared by everyone ) that we ride in groups of three, no more than four, and the rider at the rear of each group calls the shots! A gap of say twenty meters between each group also provides stepping stones for cars behind to overtake if the width of the road allows. In my view, a string of twenty riders in a small country lane just doesn’t work. Sensibly the quicker riders go ahead and the slowest bring up the rear.

I’m sure there are others who would like to express their own views and bring to light some of the difficulties they frequently encounter when out cycling.